Both of these photos are of Caylee Marie Anthony. In one she is wearing the Disney dress which is the topic of a lot of squabbling. Here's the cliff's notes version: During one of the searches for Caylee, a Minnie Mouse dress was found near the airport. It got leaked, Nancy Grace caught wind, and the topic was raised on the Nancy Grace show. It was announced that said dress was a size 6. It was also raised that and concluded on the show that a size 6 would fit a 3-year-old. Wow....must be a huge 3-year-old! At the time Caylee disappeared she wasn't quite three yet, so she more than likely wore a 2T or 3T. Anyway, I even saw a post on a forum (unnamed) saying that Disney's costumes are sized big and they also shrink. Jeez....what are these costumes made of?.....wool!?! I think not. The smallest size I found that this dress comes in is a size "12 Months". I suppose after that shrinks it would fit an embryo. Using Disney's costume size chart, a size 12M would fit a 9-12 mos child that is 26-29" tall with a weight of 18-22 lbs. The size "6" would fit a 5-6 yr old child that is 45-48" tall with a weight of 43-50 lbs. This size fits a 5-6 year old child and Caylee was bearly three weighing 35 lbs when she went missing. Also, take a look at the pictures above. Caylee at almost three and then a much smaller baby Caylee wearing the infamous Minnie Mouse Costume!! Baby Caylee looks just a little over a year old in that photo! No way is that a size 6. In all likelihood Caylee's dress is a size 18M which fits a child 29-31"inches tall weighing between 22-26 lbs.
Caylee's dress was found tucked away in her closet. I read posts that state George or Cindy Anthony could have purchased a new Minnie Mouse dress and are trying to pass it off as the original. Give me a break! Those guys can't even take a leak without someone knowing about it!
People want the dress that was found to be Caylee's because they want answers. Everybody wants answers....but trying to make something "fit" when it doesn't is the wrong answer. I rest my case....for the time being, that is.
No comments:
Post a Comment